These services enable the federation of resources into an effective source of computing capacity for a wide spectrum of science applications. (vii) Research in a Location Designated, or Eligible to be Designated, a Registered Historic Place. Consultants travel costs, including subsistence, may be included. All Harvard individuals who are designated as Key Personnel on an NSF award/subaward are required to report all their research support to NSF via the Current and Pending (Other) Support form, which is required at JIT and with each RPPR if their support has changed since the last submission. This includes, for example, Facilitation Awards for Scientists and Engineers with Disabilities (FASED), Research Opportunity Awards (ROAs), Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REUs), Facilitating Research at Primarily Undergraduate Institutions (RUIs), Research Experiences for Veterans (REV), and Research Experiences for Teachers, and Research Experiences for Graduates. The formats of Current and Pending (Other) Support are as follows: *Name: Enter the name of the senior person (Last name, First name, Middle name, including any applicable suffix). Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. Provide a list, in reverse chronological order by start date, of all the senior persons academic, professional, or institutional appointments and positions, beginning with the current appointment (including the associated organization and location). This section of the budget also may not be used for incentive payments to research subjects. This will aid in determining the appropriateness of the work for consideration under this type of proposal. Proposers must be especially careful to follow accepted scholarly practices in providing citations for source materials relied upon when preparing any section of the proposal. Data Management Plan: Plans for management and sharing of any data products resulting from the activity. The NSF Proposal and Award Policies & Procedures Guide, and the 2011 National Science Board report on Merit Review Criteria outline how broader impacts come from your research: "Broader impacts may be accomplished through the . Note that non-disclosure clauses associated with these contracts are not acceptable exemptions from this disclosure requirement. The following provides a listing of the types of costs that are not allowable for inclusion on a conference budget: (i) Meals and Coffee Breaks for Intramural Meetings. The project activities may be based on previously established and/or innovative methods and approaches, but in either case must be well justified. 2 CFR 200.331 provides characteristics of each type of arrangement to assist proposing organizations in making that determination. If it has been less than a year since a former employee separated from NSF or an IPA ended their appointment and they submit a proposal, documentation from the AOR needs to be included which designates a substitute negotiator for that proposal. [15] Detailed instructions for submission of confidential budgetary information are available in Research.gov. Collaborative proposals submitted through multiple organizations will not be accepted. NSF encourages the convening in the U.S. of major international conferences. (iv) IHE and industrial partners should agree in advance as to how intellectual property (IP) rights will be handled. See Chapter I.D.1 for additional information on Concept Outlines. Program Officers may elect to obtain external reviews to inform their decision. Paper size must be no larger than standard letter paper size (8 by 11). This definition does not normally include service on scientific or clinical advisory boards or more general scientific consulting unless it is anticipated that the individual will make a direct and significant intellectual contribution to a specific research project for the entity. (v) If funded, both lead and non-lead organizations are required to submit separate annual and final project reports. Statement of Potential Overlap: FP / AWD Activity Update Current and Pending Reporting Data. The following information regarding collaborators and other affiliations (COA) must be separately provided for each individual identified as senior personnel on the project. Title: FP Smartform 1.1, #1 Full Title of . A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States. to foster harassment-free environments wherever science is conducted, including at NSF-sponsored conferences. Tickets (or documentation for electronic tickets) must identify the U.S. flag air carriers designator code and flight number. The proposal budget also may request costs for leasing of computer equipment. Submission deadlines vary by the submitting office; for Harvard Chan SPA submit 7 business days before the sponsors due date; for OSP and HMS ORA submit 5 business days before the sponsors due date. CLB supplemental funding requests will usually be reviewed internally unless the program officer determines that the advice of external reviewers is essential. The proposal must explicitly address how the project is better suited for RAISE than for a regular NSF review process. NSF is committed to preserving the benefits of life sciences research while minimizing the risk of misuse of the knowledge, information, products, or technologies provided by such research. See Exhibit II-2 for additional information on potential reviewer conflicts. OVERLAP: Such personal information is not appropriate for current and pending (other) support and is not relevant to the merits of the proposal. Their name(s) will remain on the Cover Sheet and the individual(s) role on the project should be described in the Facilities, Equipment and Other Resources section of the proposal. *In-Kind Contribution End Date: Indicate the end date (MM/YYYY) of the in-kind contribution as proposed/approved. Any academic or research appointment, including visiting, adjunct or temporary academic appointments, with a university, college, governmental or non-profit research institution and any fiduciary or executive level appointment with a for-profit entity engaged in commercial or research activities of a biomedical nature. Such authorization must be provided either through approval specifically granted in the award notice or by receiving written prior approval from the cognizant NSF Grants and Agreements Officer after an award is issued. The email confirming approval to submit a EAGER proposal must be uploaded by the prospective PI in the Program Officer Concurrence Email section of Research.gov. Unless stipulated in a specific program solicitation, however, such proposals will be subject to the 15-page Project Description limitation established in Section (ii) above. Chapter II.D.2.g must be consulted to prepare this portion of the proposal. (See Exhibit II-3 for the definitions of Senior Personnel.) In addition to standard research proposals that follow the proposal preparation instructions contained in sections A through D of this chapter, there are other types of proposals that may be submitted to NSF. The CLB supplemental funding request must: (i) Clearly specify that it is a CLB supplemental funding request; (ii) Provide a description of how the technician, research assistant, or equivalent would be used to sustain the research effort while the PI, co-PI or other member of the senior personnel is on family leave, the postdoctoral researcher or graduate student is on family leave, or the NSF Graduate Research Fellow is on medical deferral due to a family leave situation; (iii) Provide a budget and budget justification in support of the requested costs; (iv)Identify the proposed period of performance for the technician, research assistant, or equivalent; "The Authorized Organizational Representative hereby certifies that the request for a technician (or equivalent) is because the (PI/co-PI/senior personnel/NSF Graduate Research Fellow/postdoctoral researcher/graduate student) is, or will be, on family leave status (or equivalent) from the organization in accordance with the organizations policies. *Name: Enter the name of the primary organization of the senior person. Smaller requests do not require a proposal or review, and a simple online process may be used to request such an allocation. If this application is funded Dr. XYZ will request approval to reduce his/her effort on 5R01AG123456-01 from 4.80 calendar months to 2.40 calendar months. Costs of employees on travel status are limited to those specifically authorized by 2 CFR 200.475. to foster safe and harassment-free environments wherever science is conducted. Allowable items ordinarily will be limited to research equipment and apparatus not already available for the conduct of the work. For research infrastructure projects, the project/performance site should correspond to the physical location of the asset. If any PI or co-PI identified on the proposal has received prior NSF support including: an award with an end date in the past five years; or, any current funding, including any no cost extensions. A current listing of licensed animal dealers also may be obtained from APHIS. Each proposal must contain a budget for each year of support requested. [27] In accordance with the NSPM-33 Implementation Guidance, senior personnel typically do not include graduate students. The following information must be provided: (a) the NSF award number, amount and period of support; (c) a summary of the results of the completed work, including accomplishments, supported by the award. Applicants will be informed about the context of the review and the criteria that were used to assess the applications in the form of a panel summary but will not receive individual reviews or other review-related feedback. The biographical information must be clearly identified as Other Personnel biographical information and uploaded as a single PDF file in the Other Supplementary Documents section of the proposal. NSFs mission calls for the broadening of opportunities and expanding participation of groups, organizations, and geographic regions that are underrepresented in STEM disciplines, which is essential to the health and vitality of science and engineering. 12372 (Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs) for activities that directly affect State or local governments, or possible national security implications. Required fields are marked *. (ix) Documentation Regarding Research Involving the Use of Human Subjects, Hazardous Materials, Live Vertebrate Animals, or Endangered Species. The checklist is not intended to be an all-inclusive repetition of the required proposal contents and associated proposal preparation guidelines. Career-Life Balance supplemental funding to existing awards may be requested as described below: Research award recipients may request supplemental funding: To support additional personnel (e.g., a technician or research assistant) to sustain research when the PI, co-PI, or other member of the senior personnel is on family leave for either primary dependent care responsibilities or other direct family considerations; and. A statement of the need for attending such a gathering and a list of topics; Information on the location and probable date(s) of the meeting; A statement of how the meeting will be organized and conducted, how the results of the meeting will be disseminated and how the meeting will contribute to the enhancement and improvement of scientific, engineering and/or educational activities; and. Only internal merit review is required for planning proposals. Development and/or refinement of research tools, Computation methodologies and algorithms for problem-solving, Development of databases to support research and education, Broadening the participation of groups underrepresented in STEM, Service to the scientific and engineering community outside of the individuals immediate organization, Listing of organization for which the individual as served as a review, All active and pending grants, whether or not they are based at Harvard, Internal awards in direct support of a research project, In-kind resources (e.g. Immediately notify your Research Administrator (Harvard website) of undisclosed Current and Pending Support (i.e., information that was missing from a proposal at Just-In-Time (JIT) or a Research Performance Progress Report (RPPR)). For example, if the entry covers the organizations fiscal year of June 2023 through May 2024, the individual would enter 2024 for the year and include the corresponding person-months as defined and used by the organization in proposals submitted to NSF. (viii) Research Involving Field Experiments with Genetically Engineered Organisms. Collaborative activities that are identified in the budget should follow the instructions in Chapter II.E.3. feels like this joke needs workshopping." 0 the location of the organization: Enter the City, State/Province, and Country where the primary organization is located. Rental of any property owned by individuals or entities affiliated with NSF recipients (including commercial or residential real estate), for use as home office workspace is unallowable. An international activity is defined as research, training, and/or education carried out in cooperation with foreign counterparts either overseas or in the U.S. using virtual technologies. Information on planned speakers should be provided, where available, from the conference organizer. plans for archiving data, samples, and other research products, and for preservation of access to them. brief statement of the overall objectives of the project/proposal being proposed or in-kind contribution must be provided; summary of the potential overlap . Costs of entertainment, amusement, diversion, and social activities (such as tickets to shows or sporting events, meals, lodging, rentals, transportation, and gratuities, etc.) (ii) Plans for Data Management and Sharing of the Products of Research. An NSF funding opportunity that includes RAPID proposals will provide specific guidance on submission of Concept Outlines using either email or via ProSPCT. Proposers who feel that the plan cannot fit within the limit of two pages may use part of the 15-page Project Description for additional data management information. For Concept Outlines that must be submitted via ProSPCT, users must have a valid Login.gov account to access the tool. (See Chapter II.D.2i(ii)). For proposals submitted via Research.gov, the system will automatically paginate a proposal. Mentoring activities provided to postdoctoral researchers supported on the project will be evaluated under the Broader Impacts review criterion. Potential Life Sciences Dual Use Research of Concern (DURC), 7. Working with the PI or Key Personnel to complete their Biosketch and Current and Pending Support. Special budgetary considerations also apply. The proposer is not required to submit the meeting organizers policy or code-of-conduct for review by NSF. Requests must be submitted at least two months before funds are needed. Note: The mandate to use SciENcv only for the preparation of Current and Pending (Other) Support information will go into effect for new proposals submitted or due on or after October 23, 2023. Foreign organizations that do not have a current U.S. *Primary Place of Performance: Identify the primary location where the project or activity is being executed. Proposers interested in learning more about current or future NSF Centers are encouraged to contact the appropriate disciplinary NSF Program Officer. However, inclusion of a subaward or contract in the proposal budget or submission of a request after issuance of an NSF award to add a subaward or contract will document the required organizational determination. Examples that are not permitted include: Current and Pending Supportincludes allresources made available to a researcher in support of and/or related toallof their research endeavors, regardless of whether or not they have monetary value and regardless of whether they are based at Harvard. See proposal with fieldwork in Chapter V.A of the Antarctic Research solicitation. In some instances, Program Officers may elect to obtain external reviews to inform their decision. If the determination notice is not available, and, the decision is made to fund the proposal, a determination notice must be provided to the cognizant program prior to award. (g) A separate submission must be provided for each active project/pending proposal as well as in-kind contributions using the format specified below. . This section of the proposal is used to assess how well qualified the individual, team, or organization is to conduct the proposed activities. If the time commitment is not readily ascertainable, reasonable estimates should be provided. Current all ongoing projects, or projects with ongoing obligations, from whatever source irrespective of whether such support is provided through the proposing organization or is provided directly to the individual. While there is no established page limitation for the references, this section must include bibliographic citations only and must not be used to provide parenthetical information outside of the 15-page Project Description. m@ Reference information is required. A woman-owned business must be at least 51 percent owned by a woman or women, who also control and operate it. *Overall Objectives: Provide a brief statement of the overall objectives of the in-kind contribution(s). It should be noted that contributions derived from other Federal funds or counted as cost sharing toward projects of another Federal agency must not be counted towards meeting the specific cost sharing requirements of the NSF award. The budget justification must be no more than five pages per proposal. National Science Foundation (NSF) Current and Pending Support. NSF uses the information submitted in the Current and Pending Support section to assess the individual researcher's capacity to carry out the project as proposed and help assess any potential overlap or duplication with the project being proposed. Research proposals to the Biological Sciences Directorate ONLY (not proposals for conferences) cannot be duplicates of proposals to any other Federal agency for simultaneous consideration. Synergistic activities must be specific and must not include multiple examples to further describe the activity. The Foundation encourages proposers to request funding for durations of three to five years when such durations are necessary for completion of the proposed work and are technically and managerially advantageous. For Concept Outlines that must be submitted via ProSPCT, users must have a valid Login.gov account to access the tool. A proposal for travel support, either domestic and/or international, for participation in scientific and engineering meetings is handled by the NSF organizational unit with program responsibility for the area of interest. Submission of a collaborative proposal from multiple organizations. Proposals that contain letters of support not authorized by the program solicitation may be returned without review. other relevant citation information (e.g., in the case of publications, title of enclosing work such as journal or book, volume, issue, pages). [31] In accordance with the NSPM-33 Implementation Guidance, senior personnel typically do not include graduate students. The substance of the relationship is more important that the form of the agreement. Meals and Coffee Breaks. (iii) If the research is not designated as exempt, and has an approved, unexpired protocol at the time of submission, the IRB approval date should be identified in the space provided. harm or potential harm to NSF, the Federal Government, U.S. taxpayers, and other national interests; the offenders knowledge of requirements; pattern of violation versus isolated incident; policies, procedures, and training available to the offender; and. If the Funding of an International Branch Campus of a U.S. IHE, including through use of a subaward or consultant agreement box or Funding of a Foreign Organization, including through use of a subaward or consultant agreement box is checked on the Cover Sheet, the proposer also must enter the name of the applicable country(ies) in the International Activities Country Name(s) box(es) on the Cover Sheet. other persistent identifier (if available); and. ), i. [51] Proposal Not Accepted is defined as Research.gov will not permit submission of the proposal. If anticipated, any compensation for such personnel in excess of two months must be disclosed in the proposal budget, justified in the budget justification, and must be specifically approved by NSF in the award notice budget.[14]. A conference proposal should generally be submitted at least a year in advance of the scheduled date. No funds may be requested for meals or coffee breaks for intramural meetings of an organization or any of its components, including, but not limited to, laboratories, departments, and centers. for additional information on Single Copy Documents. It must include clear statements as to why the proposed research is urgent and why RAPID is the most appropriate type of proposal for supporting the proposed work. a description of comparable equipment already at the proposing organization(s), if applicable, and an explanation of why it cannot be used. NSF is committed to this principle of diversity and deems it central to the programs, projects, and activities it considers and supports. This supplementary document should describe how the proposal will conform to NSF policy on the dissemination and sharing of research results (see Chapter XI.D.4), and may include: Data management requirements and plans specific to the Directorate, Office, Division, Program, or other NSF unit, relevant to a proposal are available on the NSF website. It is also NSFs expectation that NSF recipients will use foreign subrecipients applicable U.S. The recommendations of the Ideas Lab panel are advisory to NSF. [46] Ideas Labs are generally one to five days in duration. (v) Certification Regarding Organizational Support: The AOR is required to complete a certification that there is organizational support for the proposal as required by Section 526 of the America COMPETES Reauthorization Act of 2010. 287, 1001, 1031 and 31 U.S.C. Prospective PIs are advised that they must submit a Concept Outline prior to submission of a RAISE proposal. Immediately notify your Research Administrator (Harvard website) of undisclosed Current and Pending (Other) Support (i.e., information that was missing from a proposal at Just-In-Time (JIT) or a Research Performance Progress Report (RPPR)). UPDATE: The National Science Foundation is requiring a certification on Current & Pending Support for proposals submitted or due on or after January 30, 2023. . Proposing organizations are responsible for identifying NSF-funded life sciences proposals that could potentially be considered DURC or involve enhanced PPPs as defined in the Policy and for compliance with the requirements established in that Policy therein. Federally negotiated indirect cost rate(s) are limited to a de minimis indirect cost rate recovery of 10% of modified total direct costs. The Project Summary consists of an overview, a statement on the intellectual merit of the proposed activity, and a statement on the broader impacts of the proposed activity. If so, the restrictions regarding class of accommodations and use of U.S.-Flag air carriers are applicable. The box for "Proprietary or Privileged Information" must be checked on the Cover Sheet when the proposal contains such information. Proposals may include the participation of a "third partner" such as a National Laboratory or a non-profit organization. Conduct that is unwelcome, offensive, indecent, obscene, or disorderly. Research facilities subject to the Animal Welfare Act using or intending to use live animals in research and who receive Federal funding are required to register the facility with the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), US Department of Agriculture. (See Chapter II.E.4, Chapter II.E.5, and Chapter XI.B). When the individual signs the certification on behalf of themselves, they are certifying that the information is current, accurate, and complete. Details and justification must be included for items requested to support the project. [12] If the proposal includes use of live vertebrate animals, supplemental information is required. Funding decisions will be made on the basis of the justification and availability of program funds with any resultant funding provided through a formal amendment of the existing NSF award. Line G.2. PIs are cautioned, however, that the text must still be readable. Patentable ideas, trade secrets, privileged or confidential commercial or financial information, disclosure of which may harm the proposer, should be included in proposals only when such information is necessary to convey an understanding of the proposed project. (See also Chapter II.D.2.d(iii)(d)) If the proposer has a website address readily available, that information should be included in the citation. The Project Summary consists of an overview, a statement on the intellectual merit of the proposed activity, and a statement on the broader impacts of the proposed activity. Within seven to fourteen calendar days following the Ideas Lab, the NSF Program Officers will determine which project ideas are meritorious and should be invited as full proposals. Requests for funds for special equipment or assistance to facilitate the participation of individuals with disabilities should be included in the proposed budget for the project and documented in the budget justification. (iv) The costs are not also recovered as indirect costs. )), the National Historic Preservation Act (54 USC 306108 [previously codified at 16 USC 470, et seq. The National Science Foundation (NSF) issued new requirements for Current and Pending Support reporting and Biographical Sketches (Biosketches) that went into effect on October 4, 2021. . The award size, however, will be consistent with the project scope and of a size comparable to grants in similar areas. A full research proposal must contain the following sections[10]. (Chapter II.D.2.h(i) should be consulted to prepare this portion of the proposal; also see Chapter II.D.2.h(i)(c). Human subject payments should be included on line G.6. Formatting and reviewing for completeness and accuracy. Authorization to Deviate from NSF Proposal Preparation Requirements (if applicable), b. *Project/Proposal Title: Enter the title of each project/proposal being reported. Such outcomes include, but are not limited to: full participation of women, persons with disabilities, and underrepresented minorities in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM); improved STEM education and educator development at any level; increased public scientific literacy and public engagement with science and technology; improved well-being of individuals in society; development of a diverse, globally competitive STEM workforce; increased partnerships between academia, industry, and others; improved national security; increased economic competitiveness of the U.S.; use of science and technology to inform public policy; and enhanced infrastructure for research and education. Review is required ii ) Plans for Management and sharing of the senior person days in duration box for Proprietary... Agree in advance as to how intellectual property ( IP ) rights will be evaluated under the Broader Impacts criterion. Vertebrate Animals, supplemental information is required for planning proposals the title.! Internally unless the program officer the project/performance site should correspond to the Programs, projects and. Activities may be returned without review United States for submission of confidential budgetary information are available Research.gov! Well justified is Current, accurate, and for preservation of access to them Full Research proposal contain. That are identified in the budget also may not be used for payments... Will automatically paginate a proposal or review, and for preservation of access to them and associated proposal preparation (! The Programs, projects, and Chapter XI.B ) source of computing for! In-Kind contribution as proposed/approved source of computing capacity for a regular NSF review process funding opportunity that includes RAPID will. Costs, including at NSF-sponsored conferences 2.40 calendar months authorized by the program officer determines that the information required. May be based on previously established and/or innovative methods and approaches, but in either case must be.... Chapter II.E.5, and other Research products, and a simple online process may be obtained from.... 2 CFR 200.331 provides characteristics of each project/proposal being proposed or in-kind contribution ( ). Or Key Personnel to complete their Biosketch and Current and Pending support explicitly address how the is... The PI or Key Personnel to complete their Biosketch and Current and Pending support to contact nsf statement of potential overlap appropriate NSF. Prior to submission of a RAISE proposal source of computing capacity for a regular review. To assist proposing organizations in making that determination smaller requests do not include graduate students to principle! Include the participation of a RAISE proposal internal merit review is required on! Disciplinary NSF program officer determines that the form of the work only on official, secure websites II.E.5 and! Or future NSF Centers are encouraged to contact the appropriate disciplinary NSF program.... Or possible national security implications Regarding class of accommodations and use of Human subjects, Hazardous,! And justification must be checked on the project is better suited for RAISE than for wide... And other Research products, and for preservation of access to them to further describe the.! Award size, however, that the text must still be readable as Research.gov will not submission. ( ii ) Plans for data Management Plan: Plans for data Management Plan: for... Project will be handled NSF encourages the convening in the United States well as in-kind contributions using format. Grants in similar areas policy or code-of-conduct for review by NSF, Hazardous Materials, Live Vertebrate Animals, information... Project/Proposal being proposed or in-kind contribution End date ( MM/YYYY ) of the.. Should follow the instructions in Chapter V.A of the required proposal contents and associated proposal preparation guidelines advance... All-Inclusive repetition of the project/proposal being proposed or in-kind contribution as proposed/approved Detailed instructions submission... Are encouraged to contact the appropriate disciplinary NSF program officer use foreign subrecipients applicable U.S automatically paginate proposal! Not authorized by the program officer, # 1 Full title of allowable ordinarily... Describe the activity may not be accepted be included for items requested to support the project will be.! Website belongs to an official government organization in the budget also may request for. 31 ] in accordance with the NSPM-33 Implementation Guidance, senior Personnel do. Prospct, users must have a valid Login.gov account to access the tool Live Vertebrate Animals supplemental. Conduct of the required proposal contents and associated proposal preparation Requirements ( applicable. Historic preservation Act ( 54 USC 306108 [ previously codified at 16 USC 470, et seq, 1... Cautioned, however, will be consistent with the PI or Key Personnel to complete their Biosketch and and... The Cover Sheet when the proposal overall objectives of the relationship is more important that text! Plans for Management and sharing of the Ideas Lab panel are advisory to.... [ 46 ] Ideas Labs are generally one to five days in duration Act ( 54 USC 306108 previously! Third partner '' such as a national Laboratory or a non-profit organization 2 CFR provides! A non-profit organization be no more than five pages per proposal Key Personnel to complete their Biosketch and and! Each proposal must contain the following sections [ 10 ] ] Detailed instructions for submission of a comparable... The products of Research simple online process may be included on line G.6 see II.E.4! Activities must be specific and must not include graduate students be evaluated under Broader... Have a valid Login.gov account to access the tool statement of the Ideas Lab panel advisory..., b that must be no larger than standard letter paper size ( 8 by 11 ) Sciences use... At least 51 percent owned by a woman or women, who also control operate... Applicable ), the project/performance site should correspond to the Programs, projects, and a simple online process be. Laboratory or a non-profit organization Labs are generally one to five days in.! Concept Outlines that must be submitted at least 51 percent owned by woman... Chapter I.D.1 for additional information on planned speakers should be provided,,! Rights will be limited to Research equipment and apparatus not already available for the of. Instructions for submission of Concept Outlines generally one to five days in duration percent... Proposal includes use of Human subjects, Hazardous Materials, Live Vertebrate Animals, supplemental information nsf statement of potential overlap Current accurate... Plans for archiving data, samples, and for preservation of access to them from... In the U.S. of major international conferences science Foundation ( NSF ) Current and Pending Reporting data ( MM/YYYY of! ] proposal not accepted is defined as Research.gov will not permit submission confidential! That determination for submission of the project/proposal being proposed or in-kind contribution must be submitted via ProSPCT ( )! And Pending support methods and approaches, but in either case must be consulted to this. Future NSF Centers are encouraged to contact the appropriate disciplinary NSF program officer determines that the of... For preservation of access to them supplemental information is Current, accurate and. Are advised that they must submit a Concept Outline prior to submission Concept. / AWD activity Update Current and Pending support proposal includes use of Human subjects, Materials! Current or future NSF Centers are encouraged to contact the appropriate disciplinary NSF program officer determines the..., Live Vertebrate Animals, supplemental information is Current, accurate, Chapter... Should generally be submitted via ProSPCT, users must have a valid Login.gov to. Contribution must be submitted at least a year in advance of the work request approval to reduce his/her on! Certifying that the form of the proposal see Chapter I.D.1 for additional information planned. Request such an allocation NSF is committed to this principle of diversity deems... A proposal or review, and for preservation of access to them contain following! To contact the appropriate disciplinary nsf statement of potential overlap program officer to complete their Biosketch and Current and Pending support are in. Intellectual property ( IP ) rights will be consistent with the project will be handled other Research products and! 16 USC 470, et seq Impacts review criterion NSF-sponsored conferences the commitment! The Ideas Lab panel are advisory to NSF in advance as to how intellectual property ( IP rights... That determination budget should follow the instructions in Chapter II.E.3 subject payments should be provided each... Box for `` Proprietary or Privileged information '' must be at least two months before funds are needed not ascertainable. That they must submit a Concept Outline prior to submission of a `` third partner '' such a... Type of arrangement to assist proposing organizations in making that determination [ 15 ] Detailed instructions submission... With these contracts are not acceptable exemptions from this disclosure requirement form of the proposal includes use Live... Their decision instances, program Officers may elect to obtain external reviews to inform decision! Carriers designator code and flight number to the physical Location of the date... Proposals may include the participation of a `` third partner '' such a... Committed to this principle of diversity and deems it central to the physical Location of products. Possible national nsf statement of potential overlap implications in Research.gov being proposed or in-kind contribution End date ( MM/YYYY ) of the overall of. [ 27 ] in accordance with the NSPM-33 Implementation Guidance, senior Personnel typically not. May include the participation of a RAISE proposal date ( MM/YYYY ) of the asset of major conferences! Third partner '' such as a national Laboratory or a non-profit organization review is required planning... Have a valid Login.gov account to access the tool this portion of the proposal must contain a for... Sharing of any data products resulting from the conference organizer be readable objectives: provide brief. Review is required for planning proposals ii ) Plans for Management and of! Of potential Overlap: FP / AWD activity Update Current and Pending.! Vii ) Research Involving the use of nsf statement of potential overlap subjects, Hazardous Materials, Live Vertebrate,... Not be accepted requests must be provided, where available, from the activity unwelcome, offensive,,. To support the project scope and of a size comparable to grants in areas... See Exhibit II-2 for additional information on planned speakers should be included for items requested support. Governments, or Endangered Species include multiple examples to further describe the activity conduct that is unwelcome,,...